 | | for the week ending October 6, 2019 | | |
 | Why the industry should cheer Block.one's SEC settlement
CoinDesk's Mike Casey wades into the thorny issue of the U.S. government settlement struck with blockchain startup Block.one, which held the EOS initial coin offering at the center of the dispute. Read more in THE TAKEAWAY below. | | |
 TOP TRENDS ON COINDESK | | |
Here are some of the biggest stories this week on CoinDesk.com...
FEE HIKE FURY: Coinbase Pro, the cryptocurrency exchange’s platform for professional and institutional traders, is set to increase its fees early next week. On Oct. 7 at 22:00 UTC, Coinbase will usher in higher rates and new tiered accounts for those transacting under $10,000 and between $10,000–$50,000 monthly, according to a blog post. Coinbase said the increase is "slight" and a response “to client needs." Popular macro crypto analyst Alex Krüger pointed out, however, that a hefty 150-percent increase is coming for some low-volume accounts. “That sucks for the little guy,” said one online commentator. Full story
NO APPLE COIN: Apple CEO Tim Cook said the company would not launch a cryptocurrency. In an interview with Les Echos, Cook said, “I deeply believe that money must remain in the hands of states. I am not comfortable with the idea that a private group creates a competing currency. A private company does not have to seek to gain power in this way.” The comment may be a dig at Facebook, which is developing a stablecoin payments project called Libra that has been under fire from regulators worldwide over its potential risk to financial stability and monetary policies. Full story
DIGITAL GREENBACKS? Two U.S. lawmakers want the Federal Reserve to consider creating a digital dollar. In a letter sent to Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, Rep. French Hill (R-Ark.) and Rep. Bill Foster (D-Ill.) write that the U.S. dollar might lose influence if another country or private company creates a widely used cryptocurrency, and ask whether the central bank is considering creating its digital greenback. “We are concerned that the primacy of the U.S. Dollar could be in long-term jeopardy from wide adoption of digital fiat currencies,” they say. Full story
WAIT ALMOST OVER: Telegram Open Network (TON) is on track for its planned launch, according to an email from the company sent to investors on Wednesday. Mitja Goroshevsky, CTO of TON Labs, a startup building tools for TON developers, confirmed the authenticity of the email to CoinDesk. Investors need to provide Telegram with their public keys by Oct. 16 using the key generator to receive the tokens, or “grams,” they bought. Notably, the message says Telegram itself will recuse itself from running the network: “Investors have to select validators. Neither Telegram nor the TON Foundation will serve as validators post-launch.” Full story
|
 QUOTE OF THE WEEK | |  | “I am looking at the next five years after that. What comes next? I do think it is something around digital currency.”– Philly Fed president Patrick Harker when answering a question about the Fed’s decision to create its own real-time payments system called FedNow. | | |
The Takeaway |  | | |
The only certain thing to say about the implications of any isolated Securities and Exchange Commission case is that it’s risky to assume it sets a precedent. That goes doubly for those in which a settlement is reached with no admission of guilt.
That hasn’t stopped loads of people in the crypto community armchair-analyzing last week’s news of Block.one’s paltry penalty from the SEC over its 2017 sale of EOS ERC-20 tokens. As lawyer Stephen Palley put it over at The Block, “some commentary was useful and a whole lot of it was, well, the kind of blather one expects.”
But that’s not to say one can’t or shouldn’t try to read some tea leaves out of a decision as stunning and historically significant as this one. And while, I’m no lawyer, I am going to go out on a limb and say that, on balance, there are elements in here that the crypto industry should be happy with.
Happiness is not the way many are feeling about this result. A host of crypto commentators are royally angry about it.
It seems many folks don’t like the Block.one crew. In addition to their disdain for the EOS’s blockchain’s governance challenges andthe worrisome centralization of its network in China, many people also felt that the whopping $4 billion raised in the ICO was, well, obscene. To them, that fundraise tally was the high point – or more accurately, low point – of an ICO mania period that many in the community, rightly, want to put behind them.
Block.one’s $24 million payment -- with no admission of guilt, and a waiver allowing it to continue to legitimately raise money through future securities issues -- represented a mere 0.6% of the ICO’s gargantuan raise. Lined up against up the $225,000 infines and disgorgement that blockchain-based storage provider Sia also agreed to pay in relation to its much smaller $120,000 unregistered securities sale, it just seemed so unfair.
Good Lawyers are Worth It – If You Can Afford Them
Naturally, the announcement got people’s minds spinning. Why?
Was the soft penalty because Block.one had put geofencing in place and tried to keep its tokens out of the hands of Americans? Maybe. (Some argued that the $24 million fine is possibly about as much was raised from U.S. investors.)
Was it because the SEC now implicitly recognized that EOS has evolved into a decentralized platform and that the new, on-platform tokens into which the ERC-20 tokens were swapped, were not securities? Maybe. (Was this an application of the de facto “Hinman doctrine?".)
Was there some other, unwritten deal kept off the public record? Who knows?
The reality is that the only reliable conclusion to draw from Block.one’s “victory” is that it pays to get good lawyers. Proof of that lies in the successful waiver request that Cooley lawyer Karen Ubell submitted on the company’s behalf, detailing the lengths to which Block.One has since gone to up its compliance game and do the right thing by the SEC. As legal commentator Katherine Wu put it in a scribbled comment that was included in another one of her extremely useful post-decision annotation exercises, “Fuck man, their lawyers are good.”
One cynical conclusion to draw, then, is that the crypto startup community is now following the same norms as the Wall Street banks it seeks to dislodge. Here too, it seems, money buys protection, if not from the law per se but from the impediments to business that adverse rulings have on those of lesser means. It’s a melancholy thought for those who want this technology to lower barriers to entry and give scrappy garage-based startups a chance to change the world.
Clues in Cooperation
But I also think the negativity slung at Block.one in this instance is excessive. There’s too much desire for schadenfreude in this industry; when people are looking for blood and it’s not delivered, their disappointment is palpable.
A more upbeat view is possible. And it’s also formed from the waiver letter. While its words are those of a Block.one lawyer, not an SEC representative, the letter’s details hint at what the SEC could be looking for from token-issuing entities. Here, it’s important to note that the Cooley letter came, in Udell’s words, after “settlement discussions with the SEC” – a line that Wu annotated with the observation that the two sides had “def been back & forth for a hot minute….” That suggests its contents captured agreed-to-elements that formed the SEC’s implicit quid pro quo for its light touch.
With that in mind, the part of the letter that jumped out at me lay in the section detailing Block.one’s cooperative position with the SEC – one adopted in stark contrast with the team from Kik, who have angrily refused to settle over their ICO and are going to court with the SEC.
It’s the section where the Cooley team highlights Block.one’s work on “technological mechanisms” regarding the token it plans to issue for its decentralized media project, Voice.
These include mechanisms aimed at cutting-edge “identity verification and transfer restrictions that could be used to support compliance with securities laws” in the future, and others that could “ensure that future tokens are only provided to individuals in jurisdictions where it has been confirmed that implementation of such token will be fully compliant with all applicable regulations.”
On all these matters, the letter said, “Block.one is initiating a process of consultation and discussion with staff of the Division, including the SEC’s Strategic Hub for Innovation and Financial Technology (FinHub).”
Signs of Openness to Innovation
There’s a positive takeaway here about the SEC. The Commission has been maddeningly on the fence, or at least stubbornly silent, on how or whether it should embrace some of the more innovative compliance solutions for strengthening security while reducing friction in science.
Yet here, in a way, we have evidence that the SEC is not only open to innovation but willing even to reward transgressors who help them get their heads around that innovation.
Regulators are an unavoidable reality for startups looking to use blockchain technology to disrupt the old order. Their best hope is not to ignore them, fight them, or try to evade them, but to help them work with the crypto community’s developers to employ some of the incredible cryptographic solutions now at hand to design a more inclusive, less friction-filled financial system.
Block.one might well have gotten less than it deserves. But its approach with government is worth following.
-- Mike J Casey |
 BEYOND COINDESK... | | |
| BACK TO SCHOOL: Leading VC Chris Dixon is launching a school to train young startups in the ways of crypto. “We are going to run a startup school for crypto-specific startups and what we’ve learned over the last 7 years as best practices in this category,” Dixon, a partner at Andreessen Horowitz, told a TechCrunch conference. A landing page for the project says the school will help "crypto-curious builders navigate the idea maze." |
 WHAT WE'VE BEEN UP TO | | |
Confused about crypto custody? You’re not alone.
To help clarify the concept, we’ve written a report that highlights the concerns, addresses the obstacles and paints a picture of the progress in the custody solutions for institutional crypto investors.
You can download our "Intro to Crypto Investment" report for free here.
"Crypto In Context" is part of a series of research papers about the facts and ideas that are drawing institutional investors into crypto. Those new to crypto will find needed resources and a map of future obstacles. Those already active in crypto will find a guide to the path ahead for colleagues and clients. |
| |
What the Block.one settlement means